SETTING

 

Overview

IMG_C_ICON_DOT.gifFatigue analysis can be performed based on stress (stress-life method) and strain ( strain-life method). Fatigue life cycle and fatigue damage can be viewed for the various mean stress correction methods, i.e., Goodman, Gerber, etc

 

Methodology

 

                       Fatigue Analysis                                                                     Fatigue Lifecycle Contour

The flow chart for fatigue analysis is as shown below:

 

To start your fatigue analysis setup, it is necessary to perform static analysis for your model. When the static results are loaded, you can enter the Fatigue Analysis dialog box.

Name

Enter the name for the analysis case.

Description

Enter the description for the specific analysis case.

Method

The user can specify the S-N and E-N methods by using the loading, stress, or strain results based on the linear static analysis carried on the structure. Users can specify the following methods:

1.SN using loading history

2.EN using loading history

3.SN using stress history

4.EN using stress history

5.EN using stress/strain history

 

Analysis Set

Select the previously conducted analysis case for implementing the Fatigue Analysis.

Stress Type

Experimental test data is mostly uniaxial whereas FE results are usually multiaxial. At some point, stress must be converted from a multiaxial stress state to a uniaxial one. Equivalent (Von Mises), Signed Von Mises, Absolute Maximum Principal, and Maximum Shear options are available for this purpose.

Property

Assign the specific property for the selected material types where fatigue load cases will be generated.

 

Stress Life Approach

 

Strain Life Approach

Mean Stress Correction

For the different combinations of mean stresses and alternating stresses, we can use the Goodman, Gerber, Soderberg, Morrow, or SWT method of fatigue life prediction in the case of the S-N approach. These methods can be chosen depending on the material properties and loading criteria.

Mean Stress Correction Approach

 

If the stress cycle is fully reversible and alternating with no deviation then no mean stress correction is required and, in that case, None can be selected.

By applying several individual strain amplitudes to the E-N curve, which has been extracted through rain flow counting, each number of cycles and the corresponding individual damage level are obtained. The user can use either  Morrow, SWT, and Manson-Halford method of fatigue life prediction in the case of the E-N approach.

 

Output Result

The output results can be viewed as 1. Damage 2. Fatigue Life Cycle 3. Contribution of Fatigue; which are illustrated in the pictures below: